“It is important to recognize - credit where credit is due – the fundamental rationality of this traditional [Catholic] apologetic. It is in this respect so different from many of its degenerate and irrationalist successors. For it is not here proposed to demand faith either against all reason or without sufficient reason both for making any leap of faith at all and for making one particular, approved leap as opposed to all the other available alternatives” – Antony Flew [...]
Other News
-
On God
“The fundamental rationality of this traditional [Catholic] apologetic…”
“It is important to recognize - credit where credit is due – the fundamental rationality of this traditional [Catholic] apologetic. It is in this respect so different from many of its degenerate and irrationalist successors. For it is not here proposed to demand faith either against all reason or without sufficient reason both for making any leap of faith at all and for making one particular, approved leap as opposed to all the other available alternatives” – Antony Flew [...]
Read more → -
On God
“An even greater stupidity…”
“For just as an ordinary man would be very stupid to assert that facts proposed to him by a philosopher were false solely on the grounds that he could not personally grasp them, so too a man would be guilty of an even greater stupidity who would suspect truths revealed by God to be false solely on the grounds that they could not be investigated by reason.” – St. Thomas Aquinas (S.C.G. I.3)
Read more → -
On God
Dawkins A “No Show”
Richard Dawkins missed out on the Does God Exist? debate at the University of Manchester this week and his absence was noted on both sides of the argument. There was some controversy surrounding the event, as outspoken atheist and author Dawkins had refused four separate invitations to debate with leading Christian philosopher, William Lane Craig.
Read more →
