Featured Articles
Nihil Est Sine Ratione
Nihil Est Sine Ratione: A Defense of the Principle of Sufficient Reason (Chapter 1) - Leibniz once said that without the principle of sufficient reason, very little in philosophy and science could be demonstrated. In a similar vein, the contemporary Thomistic philosopher, Norris Clarke, has called the principle of sufficient reason the dynamic principle of metaphysics, since it is
[continue reading...]
Featured Articles
Logic
Metaphysics
On Christ
On God
On Morality
Nihil Est Sine Ratione
Nihil Est Sine Ratione: A Defense of the Principle of Sufficient Reason (Chapter 1) - Leibniz once said that without the principle of sufficient reason, very little in philosophy and science could be demonstrated. In a similar vein, the contemporary Thomistic philosopher, Norris Clarke, has called the principle of sufficient reason the dynamic principle of metaphysics, since it is
[continue reading...]
In Defense Of The Square of Opposition
The square of opposition in traditional logic is thought by many contemporary logicians to suffer from an inherent formal defect. Many of these logicians think that universal propositions in both affirmative and negative modes (traditionally called A and E propositions) do not have “existential import” for at times they can refer to a “null class”. Particular
[continue reading...]
On God
“An even greater stupidity…” “For just as an ordinary man would be very stupid to assert that facts proposed to him by a philosopher were false solely on the grounds that he could not personally grasp them, so too a man would be guilty of an even greater stupidity who would suspect truths revealed by God to be false
[continue reading...]